Sellers beware: Getting to the bottom of first-party fraud (2024)

Business was booming for a well-known gourmet food vendor. The internet was bringing in customers from around the world — but it was also fueling a growing problem.

The company was increasingly fielding requests from customers’ banks, demanding their money back. Their complaints had nothing to do with the food. Instead, the banks were upset about fraud. These callers insisted their credit card number had been stolen, and some thief had placed — and received — the order.

At first, the company was happy to issue return payments. But when certain people made the same claim over and over, the vendor realized the supposedly stolen goods had gone straight into the cardholders’ stomachs — bypassing their wallets.

When cardholders challenge genuine transactions, it’s called first-party misuse or “friendly” fraud, setting it apart from third-party fraud, in which a criminal pilfers a cardholder’s identity to make purchases for their own gain. Sometimes, first-party misuse is an honest mistake: The cardholder legitimately forgot about the purchase, or the merchant billed the charge under an unfamiliar name, leading to confusion. In other cases, the cardholder was unaware their child used their card without their permission.

But sometimes the customer is intentionally trying to get credit for a transaction they authorized — perhaps regretting an impulse buy, or simply trying to get something for free.

The damages add up. For example, a 2020 survey of merchants reported that 75% of disputes for subscriptions and digital goods, like e-books and online games, are first-party misuse. These disputes often result in chargebacks, the term for a charge being credited back on someone’s payment card. Even when a merchant avoids a chargeback at the end of a dispute, these situations are costly and time-consuming for them to fight.

“Businesses have the burden to prove the chargeback is not a legitimate dispute,” says Jeff Hallenbeck, head of payments at Forter, a fraud detection platform that makes instant, accurate decisions about chargeback legitimacy for its customers. “For most businesses, fighting the increasing number of first-party fraud chargebacks is both manual and expensive, especially for businesses with low margins.”

Fees, penalties, lost revenue from the transaction and the merchandise, and the operational costs of reviewing, gathering evidence and responding to a chargeback can total more than twice as much as the actual transaction amount, Hallenbeck says.

“Merchants have limited defenses in these disputes today, which leaves them vulnerable and exposed, ultimately undermining trust in e-commerce transactions,” says Dennis Gamiello, executive vice president of identity products and innovation at Mastercard.

To further complicate matters, first-party misuse is very difficult to detect. Merchants have effectively combatted identity fraud with authentication solutions that spot potentially problematic transactions.

But with first-party misuse, nothing untoward is happening — the customer is using their own card on their own device. It’s only later, when they dispute the charge, that red flags start to pop up. As it stands now, a merchant’s sole recourse is to blacklist repeat offenders.

Businesses must respond to these disputes because for remote transactions — such as online purchases, phone orders and automatic billing — the burden of proof lies with the merchant. “It's a huge strain,” Gamiello says.

Now Mastercard is working to combat this problem by launching the First Party Trust program, an AI-powered service where merchants can share information to prevent first-party misuse. Developed in collaboration with merchant industry groups, the program creates greater transaction transparency, optimizes approval rates and simplifies the dispute process by activating retailers’ most powerful protection against first-party misuse: data.

Merchants have plenty of transaction information that is used to help recognize genuine purchases — geographic locations, account names, device specs and behavioral and physical biometrics — but lack simple ways to share data amongst each other and get protection from fraudulent disputes.

The First-Party Trust program provides merchants with a secure channel for submitting pertinent information as part of a Mastercard transaction. Combined with Mastercard’s network-level analytics, this data will uncover insights into a cardholder’s purchase history and behavior that could indicate first-party misuse.

Merchants can submit this information at the time of purchase or once a dispute arises. During the transaction, Mastercard’s advanced AI and risk modeling will use the data to enhance the detection of true third-party fraud — and bolster the case against dishonest chargebacks later on.

By confirming the absence of any of the usual hallmarks of identity theft, the First-Party Trust program can expose first-party misuse.

By automatically collecting, organizing and parsing this data, the First-Party Trust program streamlines the chargeback process. When a customer contests a charge, Mastercard can use the information to make quicker liability decisions — without further demands on the merchant. If the analysis suggests first-party misuse, the issuer can also present that data to the customer to see if they want to cancel their claim.

“The program gives issuers the data and confidence to have that sort of conversation with the cardholder,” says Sandy Condellire, Mastercard’s senior vice president for Cyber & Intelligence Solutions. “And we can spare the merchant, who has been overburdened with the cost of friendly fraud to date.”

The program will launch in the U.S. later this year, and then expand to other markets around the world. The program is optional; if a merchant chooses to participate, they transmit the data using existing channels. Forter and Kount, an Equifax company, were among the first companies to sign on.

The best way for merchants to manage first-party misuse, says Equifax’s Robert Painter, director, chargeback management sales for the digital solutions team, is with a well-rounded plan that includes clear and simple return policies, access to order and customer data, and advanced tech to assess disputes quickly. The new program, he adds, “is going to help us provide even greater value to merchants.”

“We’re offering merchants flexibility, and enhanced security without adding friction,” Mastercard’s Gamiello says. “The program aims to eliminate this type of fraud from the ecosystem andcreate a more equitable and balanced system for everyone.”

Sellers beware: Getting to the bottom of first-party fraud (2024)

FAQs

Sellers beware: Getting to the bottom of first-party fraud? ›

Sellers beware: Getting to the bottom of first-party fraud

What is indicative of first party fraud? ›

First-party fraud refers to instances when an individual makes a promise of future repayments in exchange for goods or services without the intent to repay.

What is first party fraud red flags? ›

Red flags would include evidence of the following: Criminal activity or suspicious financial behavior. Past fraud or identity theft.

What is first party friendly fraud? ›

First-party fraud, also known as friendly fraud, occurs when customers dispute legitimate transactions as fraud.

How is 3rd party fraud different from 1st party fraud? ›

Be mindful that there are some cases where first-party fraud may occur by accident. On the other hand, third-party fraud involves the fraudster using another person's identity or information without their approval or knowledge.

Who are the perpetrators of first party fraud? ›

Unlike typical fraud scenarios where an external party attempts to defraud a business or organization, first-party fraud is perpetrated by an otherwise genuine and authorized customer or user.

What is a red flag indicating fraud? ›

Stealing of any kind (e.g., cash, petty cash, supplies, equipment, tools, data, records, etc.) Forgery. Lapping collections on customers' accounts. Pocketing payments on customers' accounts, issuing receipts on self-designed receipt books.

What best describes 1st party fraud? ›

First-party fraud is when a person or entity commits fraud using their own unique information, not someone else's. In third-party fraud, the fraudster assumes the identity of another to commit fraud. In first-party fraud, it's the actual account holder or customer using their own credentials for fraudulent ends.

Who commits first party fraud? ›

This report focuses on a particular sub-set of frauds, first-party fraud: those that are committed by customers (i.e. not by employees or people using stolen or fake identities).

What is a first party fraud marker? ›

Victim of Impersonation: if you have been the victim of identity fraud, then a marker will appear on your file for 13 months. 3. First Party Fraud: this involves the promise of future repayment in exchange for goods or services, but with no intent to repay. This can remain on your file for up to six years.

What is the crime of first party fraud? ›

What is first-party fraud? First-party fraud is when an individual or an organization purposely misrepresents their identity or provides incorrect information to gain an unfair or unlawful advantage. This may involve using a synthetic identity.

What is the rate of first party fraud? ›

Socure research conducted in October 2023 found that 35% of Americans surveyed admitted to committing some form of first-party fraud, with 34% of those who committed fraud saying they did so due to economic hardship.

What are the indicators of financial statement fraud red flags? ›

Unexplained bonuses or loans; Missing documents; Discrepancies and unexplained transactions; and. Too little cash collected from the revenues being reported.

References

Top Articles
The Urge To Overtake Time, by Fir Cone Children
Dry socket paste dressings- The brown stuff dentists use.
Bild Poster Ikea
Thor Majestic 23A Floor Plan
Dte Outage Map Woodhaven
Nehemiah 4:1–23
Free Atm For Emerald Card Near Me
Ross Dress For Less Hiring Near Me
Flixtor The Meg
Dr Klabzuba Okc
What's Wrong with the Chevrolet Tahoe?
Edgar And Herschel Trivia Questions
R Tiktoksweets
Caroline Cps.powerschool.com
Hope Swinimer Net Worth
Seattle Rpz
Stihl Km 131 R Parts Diagram
Directions To Advance Auto
Forum Phun Extra
Foxy Brown 2025
Jet Ski Rental Conneaut Lake Pa
Forest Biome
Samantha Aufderheide
Teekay Vop
Olivia Maeday
208000 Yen To Usd
Bolly2Tolly Maari 2
Annapolis Md Craigslist
Shiny Flower Belinda
O'reilly's In Monroe Georgia
101 Lewman Way Jeffersonville In
Hannah Jewell
Lincoln Financial Field, section 110, row 4, home of Philadelphia Eagles, Temple Owls, page 1
Shnvme Com
Rocketpult Infinite Fuel
Closest 24 Hour Walmart
A Man Called Otto Showtimes Near Amc Muncie 12
The disadvantages of patient portals
Claim loopt uit op pr-drama voor Hohenzollern
Wlds Obits
Urban Blight Crossword Clue
Worcester County Circuit Court
Skyward Marshfield
Clausen's Car Wash
Fairbanks Auto Repair - University Chevron
Aloha Kitchen Florence Menu
Plumfund Reviews
A Man Called Otto Showtimes Near Cinemark Greeley Mall
Rétrospective 2023 : une année culturelle de renaissances et de mutations
Strawberry Lake Nd Cabins For Sale
Palmyra Authentic Mediterranean Cuisine مطعم أبو سمرة
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Prof. Nancy Dach

Last Updated:

Views: 6059

Rating: 4.7 / 5 (57 voted)

Reviews: 80% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Prof. Nancy Dach

Birthday: 1993-08-23

Address: 569 Waelchi Ports, South Blainebury, LA 11589

Phone: +9958996486049

Job: Sales Manager

Hobby: Web surfing, Scuba diving, Mountaineering, Writing, Sailing, Dance, Blacksmithing

Introduction: My name is Prof. Nancy Dach, I am a lively, joyous, courageous, lovely, tender, charming, open person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.